He
walked alone down a long path to the front gate to end the fevered speculation
that had surrounded the news of his impending release. What would he say? Who
would he blame for the centuries of oppression of South Africa’s black people
and for his own 27 years of often brutal captivity?
At
that moment he held the future of his nation in his hands.
And
then he began to speak, and there was a surreal, almost dream-like quality of
the speech he gave. There was no bitterness; no rancour, no demands for
reprisals, just a calm, reasoned explanation of the arrangements for a transfer
of power to the country’s majority.
It
was the kind of address that might be given by the leader of a party that had
just won an election in a democracy, but without the triumphalism even that
would have involved. He reached out at once to all South African citizens in
the name of freedom, in the name of democracy, but above all in the name of
peace.
Today
his work is over, but there is still much to do. South Africa’s crime rate is
unacceptably high, corruption is rife; many black people feel they are still
not enjoying the fruits of freedom; many of the richer whites feel isolated in
gated and guarded communities.
The
task to continue to build South Africa is now in the hands of a new generation
of leaders led by President Jacob Zuma, a controversial enough figure for many
of his country-people, yet in his address to the nation, and to the world, in
which he gave the news of Mandela’s passing, there was enough to suggest that
he recognises the path pointed out by the first president is the one to follow.
South
Africa’s position as a functioning democracy with a developed economy makes it
the natural leader of the African continent and a model for others. Its role in
this century will be crucial. It should be the hope of all freedom-loving
people that Mandela’s example will live on long after the man himself becomes part of history.
No comments:
Post a Comment