Earlier this month Greek Prime Minister Alexis
Tsipras visited Skopje, the capital of neighbouring North Macedonia to be
welcomed by his counterpart, Zoran Zaev.
In a relaxed
setting in front of Government House, the two men chatted and even posed for a
selfie.
Nothing unusual
about that it would seem. After all, the countries share a common border and
would appear to have a great deal to offer each other.
In fact, it is
the closeness of their geography that has kept the nations apart for almost
three decades — a row over what many people would call semantics, but which has
fired up nationalist fervour on both sides of the border.
If it had been
left to their respective populations, the meeting of the Prime Ministers would
never have taken place.
North Macedonia
borders the Greek Province of Macedonia and ever since the break-up of
Yugoslavia, of which it was a part, the Balkan country has wanted ‘Macedonia’
as its name.
‘No’ said
Greeks on the other side of the border. Macedonia has always belonged to Greece
and the name cannot be stolen by another sovereign state.
Such a dispute
might have been settled by international arbitration, but the United Nations
didn’t want to get involved and for decades there was a compromise whereupon Skopje
was landed with the ridiculous name of the Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia (FYROM) which pleased no one.
The dispute was
having serious consequences as Greece was blocking FYROM’s bid to join the
European Union and NATO. European unity was at stake and in today’s fraught
international environment, there were dangers that unfriendly powers could
exploit the situation.
Last year
Tsipras and Zaev hammered out the compromise name of North Macedonia.
Nationalists on both sides erupted in fury and a referendum in the Balkan State
failed when a boycott reduced participation to below the required 50 per cent.
At that point
the two men displayed a quality that is sadly lacking among leaders around the
world — courage.
Tsipras forced
recognition of the name through the Greek Parliament and Zaev decided that as
around 90 per cent of those who did vote in the referendum were in favour of
North Macedonia, he would ignore the 50 per cent requirement and declare it
passed.
This led to
their historic meeting earlier this month at which both hailed a new chapter in
economic and political cooperation.
The two Prime
Ministers know they may have to pay a political price. It is quite possible
that nationalists on both sides of the border will turn on them when next they
face elections.
What they did
may not have been popular, but it was right — for European unity, the defence
of the Western way of life, and most importantly, for the long-term prosperity
of their respective peoples.
In taking the
course they did they showed true leadership, something in short supply in a democratic
world obsessed with the next opinion poll or focus group.
No comments:
Post a Comment