The creation of the
African Continental Free Trade Area (CFTA) in the Rwandan capital of Kigali
last month could be the most significant development in global economic affairs
since the Treaty of Rome set European nations on the same path 62 years ago.
Or it could be an
embarrassing failure.
To begin with, let’s look
on the bright side.
CFTA aims to bring together
all African countries, comprising 1.2 billion people with a combined Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) of more than $4 trillion, into one continental market
for goods and services.
This would lead to the
free movement of business and money across borders and a massive expansion of
intra-African trade.
By conservative estimates
the CFTA would add two per cent to Africa’s GDP growth in the largest free
trade area (in terms of member States) in the world.
The CFTA is a logical
progression from the 17-year-old African Union, whose stated aim is to
accelerate the political and socio-economic integration of the continent, with
the ambition of eventually developing a customs union, a common market and even
a single currency.
Now for a reality check.
Eleven of the continent’s
55 nations have yet to sign up to the deal. Significantly, absentees include
South Africa and Nigeria, which together represent 50 per cent of sub-Saharan
GDP. Without them the CFTA is dead in the water.
Nigerian President
Muhammadu Buhari was initially a supporter, but pulled out of the summit at the
last moment citing a need for further consultations with trade unions and
business.
South Africa’s Minister
for Trade and Industry, Rob Davies, said his country supported CFTA but did not
sign immediately “for technical reasons”.
So, both might still come
to the party.
There is also the
question of government capacity. Many of the nations that signed up to CFTA are
operating with extremely weak bureaucracies. Corruption is rife in a number of jurisdictions
while others suffer from lack of proper training plans and poor leadership.
Even so, in a world where
protectionism is on the rise, there are huge benefits for opening up
intra-African trade which currently accounts for just 10 per cent of all
commerce on the continent — compare this to 70 per cent for Europe and 25 per
cent for South-East Asia.
Whether the Treaty of
Kigali will one day rank alongside the Treaty of Rome, or whether it will be
remembered as a hopelessly utopian project that was quickly discarded only
history can judge.
However, a continent that
has been fought over, exploited and parcelled up by outsiders, is taking its
future into its own hands — and that is a hopeful sign.
No comments:
Post a Comment