In his
opening statement Netanyahu said he did not believe the Palestinians were
taking the peace process seriously, pointing to the welcome given by President
Mahmoud Abbas to the release of more than 100 Palestinian prisoners from
Israeli jails.
The
Israeli leader referred to the group as “terrorists”; however it is unlikely he
would have authorised the release of anyone regarded as a serious terrorist
threat to the State. Israeli security forces regularly trawl up rock-throwing
demonstrators useful for later release as goodwill gestures during a
high-profile visit such as Kerry’s
Netanyahu
has also brought a temporary halt to the approval of new settlement housing on
the West Bank, but again this is window dressing designed to put Israel in the
best possible light during this brief period of world attention. The building
of settlements has become an increasingly thorny issue as Palestinians see more
and more of their already tiny State being whittled away.
Despite
Kerry’s dogged optimism – “the time is soon arriving where leaders are going to
have to make difficult decisions…but it is not mission impossible,” he said –
the prospects for a lasting settlement remain as elusive as ever.
I believe
Netanyahu would genuinely like to go into serious negotiations, even to the
point where territorial concessions could be made over the settlements.
However, the reality of Israeli politics means that the views of religious
extremists and nationalists have to be taken into account.
The
Palestinian side is a mess. Abbas’ claim to legitimacy is under severe question
as constitutionally elections should have been held in 2009. His Fatah Party remains
in deadlock with Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip. Despite several attempts
elections still seem a long way off.
The
determination of the US Administration to find a solution cannot be in doubt.
Kerry has made 10 visits to the area in less than a year, but even this effort
by the world’s major power the talk is still about a “framework” to set
“guidelines” for “negotiations”. In other words talks about talks about talks.
The US
has to persist. Its influence and interest effectively blocks the involvement
of other more radical Middle Eastern elements from interfering in the Israeli-Palestinian
equation while keeping Israel’s finger off its nuclear trigger.
It would
be a dangerous day for the world should any Washington Administration decide to
walk away from this problem, however intractable it seems.
No comments:
Post a Comment