Observing the continuing turmoil in the United
Kingdom Parliament and country, it seems that for many Britons history began on
June 23, 2016.
I suppose in the 24-hour news cycle with clickbait continuously
churning out sensational headlines on mundane reports, it is inevitable that
anything more than a day old is quickly consigned to the archives, at least in popular
memory.
At a time when it is most needed, a knowledge and
understanding of the historical currents that have led to the present sorry
state in the UK are shoved aside by breathless coverage of the latest uproar
and outrage.
The dangers were noted in 2001 by former United States
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in his book Does America Need a Foreign Policy?
He wrote: “The study of history and philosophy, the
disciplines most relevant to perfecting the art of statesmanship, are neglected
everywhere or given such utilitarian interpretation that they can be enlisted
in support of whatever passes for conventional wisdom.”
No more apt description could apply to Prime Minister
Boris Johnson and his Leader of the House of Commons, Jacob Rees-Mogg, both Oxford
classic scholars who have allowed their learning to be subsumed by ego and ambition.
In this frenetic atmosphere, it has not been possible
to canvas all statements and opinions, but I have not come across a single
detailed discussion of the historical context of the UK’s engagement with
Europe.
Does anyone today realise that the Conservatives were
the original ‘Party of Europe’; that both Tory and Labour Prime Ministers
sought to enter the then exclusive six-nation club before a Conservative Prime
Minister, Edward Heath, finally achieved membership?
Brexiteers, who continually try to recruit the
‘bulldog spirit’ of wartime leader Winston Churchill to their cause,
conveniently forget (or perhaps they never knew) that Churchill was a
proto-European.
Not only did he propose union with France in 1940 as a
way of keeping his ally in World War II, he later advocated a “United States of
Europe”, 10 years before the Treaty of Rome.
Churchill was in retirement by the time the treaty was
signed and his successor, Anthony Eden, a hangover from the days of empire,
neglected to be part of it. However, his disastrous Suez campaign demonstrated
once and for all that the UK’s days as a stand-alone world power were over.
His successors, Harold Macmillan and Labour Prime
Minister Harold Wilson, both made applications to join, both thwarted by French
President Charles De Gaulle who did not want Britain in the way of his dream of
a Europe dominated by France.
Finally, after de Gaulle had left the stage, Heath
negotiated entry, which took place in 1972.
It is hard to pin down the tipping point in the Conservatives’
attitudes to Europe, but the change certainly began in the 1980s with the
leadership of Margaret Thatcher and hardened during the years the Tories spent
out of office during the Labour Governments of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.
David Cameron, a moderate Eurosceptic, was kept in
check while in coalition with the pro-EU Liberal Democrats, but after winning
Government in his own right succumbed to his more militant colleagues and
announced the 2016 referendum.
The rest, as they say, is history.
Ken Clarke, the longest serving MP in Parliament is
one of the last survivors of the ‘Party of Europe’. Sitting several rows behind
Johnson this week he rose to give this withering assessment of his leader.
“His obvious strategy is to set the conditions which
make a no deal inevitable, to make sure as much blame as possible is attached
to the EU and to this House for that consequence and then as quickly as
possible fight a flag-waving general election before the consequences of
no-deal become too obvious to the public,” he said.
“Would Mr Johnson let me know whether that clear
explanation of his policy is one he entirely accepts?”
The answer was expulsion from the party Clarke had
served with distinction in Parliament for almost half a century, along with
other Tory rebels who voted to outlaw a no-deal (among them Churchill’s
grandson Nicholas Soames).
At 79, Clarke is one of the last true statesmen in
this Parliament of fools. Attuned to history’s inevitable march, it has
sustained him in the past few years as the party he loved gradually moved away
from much he believed in. The final break this week was inevitable.
He has remained loyal to his values that have guided
him over his long public life. Unlike so many of his former colleagues, he can now
leave holding his head high.
No comments:
Post a Comment