You could be
excused for not noticing, but there has been an awful lot going on in outer
space these days.
Confrontations
in the Middle East, Brexit and the antics of the man in the White House ensure
these exciting developments get downgraded in news bulletins and relegated to
the inside pages of newspapers.
To recap,
the Chinese have landed a probe on the far side of the moon in the first step
towards establishing a permanent lunar base; a Japanese probe has touched down
on an asteroid and will return bits of it to Earth for analysis, and an Israeli
spacecraft is heading for the moon in that country’s first venture of its kind.
Then
there’s Russia, India and the European Union with varying space capabilities
and projects. Even Australia has announced the creation of a space agency.
Meanwhile
the daddy of them all, the United States National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA), continues its work with its InSight Lander just
beginning and exploration of Mars as the Opportunity Rover completed a 15-year
mission on the Red Planet — an incredible feat considering it was originally
scheduled to work for just 60 days.
Finally
NASA’s New Horizons probe has sent back pictures of the most distant object to
be photographed — a snowman-shaped clump of ice and rock 33 kilometres in
length and 6.4 billion kilometres from Earth.
While a US President once inspired a generation with
his vision of placing a man on the moon, the contribution of the present
incumbent is a call to weaponise space with the creation of an armed space
corps — a plan the Pentagon wants no part of and, thankfully, has little chance
of being approved by Congress.
Most of the other world leaders look in other
directions as the various national agencies concerned with space get on with their
jobs as best they can, usually under the continuing threat of funding cutbacks.
There is no doubt that space exploration is a very
costly business, and although I was one of millions around the world who
thrilled to the moon landings of the 1960s and early 70s, I realise that they came
about through the race to be ‘first’ between the US and the Soviet Union, a
wasteful exercise in superpower rivalry.
I still believe that space holds a continuing
fascination for millions of people, and further explorations are inevitable,
but could these be done in a better, less wasteful way?
The key would be a truly international effort with
nations contributing their current resources and expertise — no one would
probably have to give any more to the field than they do now, but the pooled
effort would have the ability to greatly accelerate the push into the cosmos.
With the International Space Station proof of what
can be achieved, Luna bases and manned explorations of Mars could be a reality,
not at some distant point in the future, but within the next decade.
This may seem like science fiction never to come
close to reality in a world currently fraught with a groundswell of nationalist
feeling in many countries, but when populism has run its course, and the
bankruptcy of its philosophy exposed, the need for international cooperation in
so many areas will be overwhelming.
Space exploration may not be high on any one
nation’s ‘to-do’ list, but it should never be discounted as an inspiration to
people everywhere and an opportunity for humankind to satisfy its noble desire
to explore and do things that have never been done before.
No comments:
Post a Comment