Perhaps inevitably,
French President Emmanuel Macron has become public enemy number one among the
United Kingdom’s anti-European leaders and their rabidly pro-Brexit (and
largely overseas owned) media backers.
Late last month in
a 100-minute speech in Paris, Macron set out a series of initiatives for a
future EU – they included the creation of a military intervention force, a
common defence budget and new agency to curb illegal immigration.
These are measured
and reasonable steps to make in the progression of the European project,
broadly according to the vision of the EU’s founding fathers who saw the Treaty
of Rome as the first step on the road to full European unity.
Indeed, it was also
the view of the UK’s wartime leader, Winston Churchill who in a speech in
Switzerland on 19 September 1946, looked forward to a “United States of Europe”
as a counter to conflicts such as the one that had just ended.
In that respect the
EU has been remarkably successful, presiding over a period of sustained peace within
its borders.
But the time has
come to move on and Macron’s roadmap is not simply timely, it is essential.
Not so according to
the UK’s main European attack dog, Nigel Farage who in a comment that sounded
uncannily like one of United States President Donald Trump’s tweets, claimed
the EU leaders were “bad people. They treat countries like the communists did”.
Farage’s outburst
comes at a time when he should be celebrating the success of his friends in
Germany’s far right where the Alternative for Germany Party won enough votes in
the country’s General Election to enter Parliament for the first time — a rare success
after the firm rejections of similar parties in France and the Netherlands.
But it also comes
at a time when his beloved Brexit is in trouble. As commentator and
geopolitical specialist Colin Chapman* points out, after the British voted by a
narrow majority to leave the EU (with more than a quarter of voters abstaining)
little progress has been made.
“UK Prime Minister Theresa
May’s weakened and divided Government has switched tactics,” Chapman writes.
“Having been prepared to
walk away from the world’s strongest economic bloc (“no deal is better than a
bad deal”), her position is now that Britain remains in the EU in all but name
for at least two years after the official exit in early 2019.
“Britain will try to secure
open access to the EU single market for UK manufacturers and services.”
Chapman says that May
appears to be moving from a ‘hard’ Brexit to a ‘soft’ one, but these new
tactics are not bearing results.
“May’s fragile Cabinet
unity is collapsing, with Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson resisting an EU
divorce payment and breaking ranks to host an event this week for a new think
tank, the Institute of Free Trade, that argues for a hard Brexit,” Chapman
writes.
“And at the conclusion of
Labour’s annual conference this week, the popular party leader, Jeremy Corbyn,
changed his position, arguing for Britain to remain in the EU single market and
customs union.
“Labour has only to gather
a few Tory rebels — and there are a growing number — and the Government faces
defeat in Parliament and another General Election. On current polls, Corbyn
would win.”
In the face of this chaos,
the last thing the Brixiteers need is a Europe with a renewed focus and an
attractive vision. It is no wonder that increasing calls for a second
referendum when the terms of exit are finally known is being greeted by strident,
almost hysterical rebuffs from the UK Government’s Department for Exiting the
European Union.
*Colin Chapman writes for
Australia Outlook, a program of the Australian Institute of International
Affairs.
No comments:
Post a Comment