It
isn’t a good time to be a public servant in the United Kingdom. As the General
Election campaign enters its final weeks, with the ruling Conservative Party
still well ahead in the polls, the rhetoric is becoming increasing aggressive
towards anyone who dares to question the Government’s main election plank — its
headlong rush to exit the European Union.
‘Do
you stand with Britain or with the EU?’ was the question in one newspaper
headline, demanding that the nation “rally behind Brexit”. The right-wing media
is encouraged by an increasingly authoritarian Prime Minister and Ministers who,
according to some insiders, are treating senior public servants more like hired
hands than trusted advisers.
This
is not because the various Permanent Secretaries and other senior officials are
seeking to derail Brexit; rather they are simply pointing out the pitfalls
along the way and the requirement for additional resources to fill them — not
unreasonable considering cuts to the Public Service over the past seven years
that have left it smaller than at any time since World War II.
While
Prime Minister Theresa May persists in saying it is ‘she’ who will be going to
Brussels and that ‘I’ will be conducting the negotiations, in reality it is the
Public Service who will be doing the heavy lifting and if the whole Brexit mess
disintegrates, it is the hopelessly over-stretched service that will be
fingered for the blame.
Much
of the problem lies with the increasing influence of ‘special advisers’ to
Ministers who are supplementing and even supplanting the advice that was once
the prerogative of Permanent Secretaries. It is a trend that has been going on
for decades, but has been taken to a new level in the current administration.
The
stories going the rounds in Whitehall are that May listens only to her two
senior advisers, Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill, who have been given the power to
slap down any public servant who dares to warn of dangers ahead.
The
spin they pump out is that in the face of a triumphant Prime Minister
strengthened by a resounding election win, EU negotiators will fall over
themselves to give the UK a favourable trade deal almost before the ink on the
final exit documents is dry.
That
is nonsense of course and senior bureaucrats past and present know it, but the
fantasy is ruthlessly pursued and should the Government get the majority
everyone is forecasting there will be no more stoplights on the road to ruin.
One
only has to look across the Atlantic to see an example of what happens when a
leader goes rogue. President Donald Trump went to Washington promising to
“drain the swamp” but in less than four months is fast sinking into a swamp of
his own making.
Trump
is facing the reality that it is one thing to deliver slogans to adoring
audiences in a school hall in Indiana, quite another to produce legislation
that makes any kind of sense in the world of realpolitik.
If
good comes out of the continuing catastrophe of his administration it should be
the demise of the myth beloved by the Tea Party right that Governments can be
run like businesses and that it only needs good, solid business sense to solve
all the problems of the world.
In
France, which has a more sophisticated electorate than in many Anglo-Saxon countries,
the so-called rise of the right received a severe and deserved setback.
While
he likes to portray himself as an outsider, newly-elected President Emmanuel
Macron knows the reforms he plans can only be worked through with the support
of knowledgeable and talented functionaries in the various Ministries that make
up the continuing system of government.
That
lesson has come too late for Brexit. What happens in Washington in the days,
weeks and months ahead, is anyone’s guess.
Interesting that you seem to see Brexit as a Left-Right issue. Tony Benn (hardly a Right-winger) opposed the Common Market, as, until now, has Jeremy Corbyn. These were (and are) people passionately concerned with democracy. Many years ago I wrote to my local MP (a pro-Europe Conservative on the Heath wing of the party) complaining about the lack of democracy in the EU and his response was that — and I quote directly — that 'in the modern world, I don't think we can take matters of sovereignty and democracy too seriously'. Maybe this is the view that has made an increasing number of Britons disenchanted with the EU.
ReplyDelete