There
were also numerous references to ‘security’ and ‘cooperation’, and this key paragraph:
“We
should collaborate more on maintaining maritime security. We should work
together on the seas and collaborate in international forums. And, we should
work for a universal respect for international law and global norms.”
Nothing
could be clearer from the Indian leader’s message: India and Australia should
provide the foundation for a democratic consensus that respects the rule of law
and opposes those that would subvert it.
He
never mentioned China, but Beijing is never far from Modi’s thoughts as he
frames his nation’s new policies for the Asia-Pacific region.
It
was no coincidence that Modi’s next stop after Australia was Suva for a meeting
of Pacific Island leaders where he announced a basket of aid and other support.
This
included a $1 million fund to help these small countries cope with rising sea
levels resulting from climate change; support for tele-medicine and
tele-education projects; promotion of trade links, relaxation of visa
restrictions and the establishment of a regular Forum for India-Pacific Island
Cooperation, with the next meeting to be held in India in 2015.
His
intentions are clear. India well be a significant player in the Pacific region
and a counterbalance to China’s growing influence there. His emphasis on
maritime security and the need to respect international forums would certainly
have been noted by countries like the Philippines and Vietnam, currently locked
in disputes over China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea.
Disputes which China resolutely refuses to take to international arbitration.
Was
it any surprise that almost before Modi had left, Chinese President Xi Jinping
flew into Suva to sign a flurry of Memorandums of Understanding with Prime
Minister Frank Bainimarama including…wait for it…”provision of goods to address
climate change” and “visa exemptions for Fijians travelling to China”.
China
has courted Bainimarama since 2006 when he ousted his country’s
democratically-elected Government in a military coup, a move that would have
delighted Beijing which prefers to deal with authoritarian Governments rather
than “inefficient” democracies.
For
a while it seemed that Fiji might be the key to China’s influence in the South
Pacific, but Bainimarama has chosen to return to the democratic path and this
year his party won a general election which was considered to be fair.
Beijing
must now tread more carefully, trading on the Fijian leader’s dislike of
Australia and New Zealand, which opposed his previous dictatorship. India,
however, is quite another matter.
It
will be fascinating to see how this all plays out in the months and years to
come.
No comments:
Post a Comment